Manufacturing traceability is a chain, and it breaks at whichever link is weakest. A serialised part can be traced back to its batch, its machine and its operator, but only if the identifier applied at the start survives everything the process does to it afterwards.
That is what makes manufacturing hardware different. In most industries a label has to survive handling. Here it may have to survive a reflow oven, a paint booth, a solvent wash or years of oil and swarf, and still be readable at audit. Get the media wrong and the traceability exists on paper but not on the part.
Reading is the other half. Direct part marks are etched into the material with no contrast and no quiet zone, and a standard imager simply will not decode them. That is a distinct scan engine chosen at purchase, not something that can be enabled later.
Specify the label against the harshest process it will meet, not the average one. The mark has to outlive the process.